Phone: (800) 531-2885

VRI Homes Blog

New listings, real estate news and community info from BetterHomesUSA

'Just Say NO to Listing Agents!'

Regrettably, since many Home sellers are not fully aware of the tremendous negotiating, marketing, merchandising and social media skills of Top-Notch Realtors® , they understandably and mistakenly conclude the following: “That if I am paying such a handsome fee to a mere ‘Listing Agent’, then a Real Estate transaction must be a fee inflated event which I must subsidize in order to promulgate an inefficiently run Industry.” This is a totally incorrect assumption in my view. Why the misperception? It begins with our Industry (and therefore consumers) referring to the individual representing the seller or marketing the property in the dreadful, if not horrific, following fashion... “WHO IS THE LISTING AGENT?” Do you think, as I do, that it would be more strategic, correct, and impressive that after saying the aforementioned, for over a century, we consider gifting ourselves a 'Professional Upgrade’? Why not collectively rally instead in support of... “WHO'S THE MARKETING REALTOR®?" “Who's the Listing Agent,” or worse yet, “I am the Listing Agent” implies: A. My job is complete...I already have the listing. B. I do no marketing. C. I represent the Listing (a piece of paper) vs. the Client. D. Consumers can ‘list’ their own properties with very little skill involved. E. I am not a Realtor®, just a Licensed Agent (What’s next, the National Association of Listing Agents vs. Realtors® ?) F. I am one step closer to a For Sale By Owner (or For Listed by Owner). G. That Buyers determine the price...because Listing Agents, and, therefore, the listing side of the transaction, have no value and therefore, due to their modest role, cannot influence or contribute to either value or outcomes. H. Because I have no value, I will use words like ‘Comps’, ‘Similar homes’ and ‘Commodity’ to refer to and marginalize your Home...because a Marketing Agent uses the Four P's of Marketing (product, price, place and promotion) and views each property as a customized opportunity – unlike a Listing Agent, who by definition, must view properties either as a ‘Commodity’ or, worse yet, an ‘interchangeable widget’. I. When MLS's mimic one another by their use of L.A. to refer to Listing Agent or S.A. to stand for Selling Agent, this also, tremendously exacerbates this problem and undermines the Realtor® brand. When a million plus Realtors® pay their dues (a bargain of the century) at the very least they should use the brand they are paying for in every way that is informative to the consumer/client. While the word 'Agent' might connote agency to some, there is a reason why Doctors and defense and prosecuting attorneys memorialize their brands even when agency is involved much more fulsomely than many Realtors® seem to be doing. Now, of course, one will always use the word ‘Listing’ as it is an agreement. Such definitional minimalism however...’Listing Agent’...should not be used unwittingly as a weapon to minimize the enormous value of Realtors® willing to assume and complete the complex Marketing role. Suggestion: Next time, try asking, “Who's the Marketing Realtor®?" or "Who's the Selling Realtor®!" I think you'll like it...and you will create greater respect, not only from consumers or clients who need to be illuminated as to how sophisticated and skilled Realtors® truly are - also yourself. Please spread my suggestion...if you agree with my recommended change, Allan Dalton P.S. – Perhaps if all Realtors® would ask "Who is the Marketing and Selling Realtor®?" there'd be fewer folks saying "Real-a-tor". There may not be a better way to honor the greatness of state and national Realtor® Associations than by better honoring the brand Realtor®. Isn't this the strategic way to think?


By: Alexander
On: 05/30/2014 21:02:51
I think your article, that can be read by regular consumers and practitioners alike diminishes us in the eyes of the general public and the headline is meant to be catchy, but actually, hurts business. And while you claim that you are promoting "Realtor" as a brand, and that is the end of your article, you are diminishing the role of agents in the eyes of consumers in general. In any profession, whether Doctor, Lawyer, or Auto-Mechanic, there are people who are excellent and people who are mediocre. However, in these professions, people still earn a fee, and not a commission, at all cost, whether you are satisified with their services or not. They earn a fee either in the form of a retainer agreement, a minimum charge for a diagnostic fee, or on a per hour basis. This is the only profession where your performance and effort is judged subjectively: where you can work very hard, but be in a market where lenders stopped lending, or have an un-cooperative seller, or an un-realistic buyer. This is the only profession where your ability to make a living is judged on production and volume, and not on amount of effort. We are in an inventory driven business. What do people come to real estate websites for? To see listings! Why do they speak to an agent? To learn representation or agency law? No, to buy a house! So your article creates a negative tone toward our profession, and as I said earlier, there are good and bad agents in this field just like there are good and bad practioners in every field. You did not accomplish your goal of promoting the Realtor@ brand. You took down the image of agents in the eyes of average consumers that read your article.

Leave a comment

Please complete the form below to submit a comment on this article. A valid email address is required to submit a comment though it will not be displayed on the site.

HTML has been disabled but if you wish to add any hyperlinks or text formatting you can use any of the following codes: [B]bold text[/B], [I]italic text[/I], [U]underlined text[/U], [S]strike through text[/S], [URL][/URL], [URL=http//]your text[/URL]